2012-09-22 - SPVM & HSBC

Exigeons une enquête publique citoyenne sur les interventions policières!

Je Me Souviens que la #ggi n’est pas finie pour plusieurs : une quantité honteuse de gens qui doivent encore aller jouer un rôle de figurant à leur propre procès, vivant sous la menace et l’intimidation d’un système judiciaire détourné à fins politiques.

Seuls, à défendre leurs cas devant des juges au rôle tout aussi prédéterminé, ils ne peuvent pas gagner devant l’application aveugle d’une jurisprudence qui n’a que faire de contexte, de sens, de réel. Avec un peu de chance, ils s’en sortiront sans trop de peines, usés d’avoir porté ce fardeau tout ce temps, mais ils n’obtiendront certainement pas justice sans un mouvement plus grand qu’eux.

Exigeons une enquête publique citoyenne sur les interventions policières!

.

*page facebook Pour une enquête publique sur les interventions policières :
https://www.facebook.com/Pouruneenquetepublique

.

Lettre pour une demande d’enquête d’une Mère en colère et solidaires!
http://journalmobiles.com/societe/printemps-erable-lettre-dune-mere-a-son-fils

.

La grève est terminée, mais pas la répression:
http://www.pressegauche.org/spip.php?article12683

.

.

photos HSBC & SPVM @ Montréal:
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.123080621186356.23844.100004532552692&type=1

.

« Federal and state authorities have chosen not to […] endanger the financial system. »

« It doesn’t take a genius to see that the reasoning here is beyond flawed. When you decide not to prosecute bankers for billion-dollar crimes connected to drug-dealing and terrorism (some of HSBC’s Saudi and Bangladeshi clients had terrorist ties, according to a Senate investigation), it doesn’t protect the banking system, it does exactly the opposite. It terrifies investors and depositors everywhere, leaving them with the clear impression that even the most « reputable » banks may in fact be captured institutions whose senior executives are in the employ of (this can’t be repeated often enough) murderers and terrorists. Even more shocking, the Justice Department’s response to learning about all of this was to do exactly the same thing that the HSBC executives did in the first place to get themselves in trouble – they took money to look the other way.
And not only did they sell out to drug dealers, they sold out cheap. »

« So the executives who spent a decade laundering billions of dollars will have to partially defer their bonuses during the five-year deferred prosecution agreement? Are you fucking kidding me? »

« So you might ask, what’s the appropriate financial penalty for a bank in HSBC’s position? Exactly how much money should one extract from a firm that has been shamelessly profiting from business with criminals for years and years? Remember, we’re talking about a company that has admitted to a smorgasbord of serious banking crimes. If you’re the prosecutor, you’ve got this bank by the balls. So how much money should you take?

How about all of it? How about every last dollar the bank has made since it started its illegal activity? How about you dive into every bank account of every single executive involved in this mess and take every last bonus dollar they’ve ever earned? Then take their houses, their cars, the paintings they bought at Sotheby’s auctions, the clothes in their closets, the loose change in the jars on their kitchen counters, every last freaking thing. Take it all and don’t think twice. And then throw them in jail.

Sound harsh? It does, doesn’t it? The only problem is, that’s exactly what the government does just about every day to ordinary people involved in ordinary drug cases. »

« No drugs were found, but police took the money anyway. Even after Smelley produced documentation proving where he got the money from, Putnam County officials tried to keep the money on the grounds that he could have used the cash to buy drugs in the future. »

« What they do is, they stop you on the street and tell you to empty your pockets, » the public defender explained. « Then the instant a pipe or a seed is out of the pocket – boom, it’s ‘public use.’ And you get arrested. »

« People spend nights in jail, or worse. In New York, even if they let you off with a misdemeanor and time served, you have to pay $200 and have your DNA extracted – a process that you have to pay for (it costs 50 bucks). »

« By eschewing criminal prosecutions of major drug launderers on the grounds (the patently absurd grounds, incidentally) that their prosecution might imperil the world financial system, the government has now formalized the double standard. »

« They’re now saying that if you’re not an important cog in the global financial system, you can’t get away with anything, not even simple possession. You will be jailed and whatever cash they find on you they’ll seize on the spot, and convert into new cruisers or toys for your local SWAT team, which will be deployed to kick in the doors of houses where more such inessential economic cogs as you live. If you don’t have a systemically important job, in other words, the government’s position is that your assets may be used to finance your own political disenfranchisement.

On the other hand, if you are an important person, and you work for a big international bank, you won’t be prosecuted even if you launder nine billion dollars. Even if you actively collude with the people at the very top of the international narcotics trade, your punishment will be far smaller than that of the person at the very bottom of the world drug pyramid. You will be treated with more deference and sympathy than a junkie passing out on a subway car in Manhattan (using two seats of a subway car is a common prosecutable offense in this city). An international drug trafficker is a criminal and usually a murderer; the drug addict walking the street is one of his victims. But thanks to Breuer, we’re now in the business, officially, of jailing the victims and enabling the criminals.

This is the disgrace to end all disgraces. It doesn’t even make any sense. There is no reason why the Justice Department couldn’t have snatched up everybody at HSBC involved with the trafficking, prosecuted them criminally, and worked with banking regulators to make sure that the bank survived the transition to new management. As it is, HSBC has had to replace virtually all of its senior management. The guilty parties were apparently not so important to the stability of the world economy that they all had to be left at their desks.

So there is absolutely no reason they couldn’t all face criminal penalties. That they are not being prosecuted is cowardice and pure corruption, nothing else. And by approving this settlement, Breuer removed the government’s moral authority to prosecute anyone for any other drug offense. Not that most people didn’t already know that the drug war is a joke, but this makes it official. »

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/outrageous-hsbc-settlement-proves-the-drug-war-is-a-joke-20121213

.

« What’s a bank got to do to get into some real trouble around here? »

« it was so out in the open, these crimes, and there’s going to be no criminal prosecution whatsoever, which is incredible. »

« the bank is too big to indict because of the threat to the world financial system »

« most people don’t know that HSBC stands for Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation. It’s a British bank that goes back to the early days of British colonialism in Asia. »

« this is not a move to preserve the banking system at all. In fact, it’s incredibly destructive. It undermines the entire world confidence in the banking system. It’s an incredible decision that, again, is met with surprise even with—by people in the financial community. »

« There are 50,000 marijuana possession cases in New York City alone every year. And here we have a bank that laundered $800 million of drug money, and they can’t find a way to put anybody in jail for that. That sends an incredible message not just to the financial sector but to everybody. It’s an obvious, clear double standard, where one set of people gets to break the rules as much as they want and another set of people can’t break any rules at all without going to jail. And I just don’t see how they don’t see this problem. »

« $1.9 billion sounds like a lot of money, and it definitely is. It’s a record settlement. No bank has ever paid this much money before. But it’s about two months’ worth of profits for HSBC. It’s not going to cripple this bank. It’s not even going to hurt them that badly for this year. It fits in line with the Goldman Sachs settlement in the Abacas case, which was hailed at the time as a record settlement. It was $575 million. But that was about 1/20th of what they got just through the AIG bailout. So, this is not a lot of money for these people. It sounds like a lot of money to the layperson, but for the crimes they committed, getting away with just money—and it’s not even their own money, it’s not their personal money, it’s the shareholders’ money—it’s incredible. It really—it literally is a get-out-of-jail-free card. »

« Basically, they can just take money from the government and pay the government back. »

http://www.alternet.org/matt-taibbi-you-can-go-prison-pot-while-big-banks-get-away-laundering-drug-cartel-cash

.

Une réflexion sur “Exigeons une enquête publique citoyenne sur les interventions policières!

  1. There is a Social Darwinian mindset at work here. Vulnerable people are fair game as far as they’re concerned. Vulnerability is a crime in and of itself. These fake so-called terrorism stings in the United States where they prey on vulnerable people in order to stage propaganda victories in the war of terror are theatrical expressions of this. There’s this suggestion that it’s all right because these vulnerable people can be used by real terrorists, so the danger is in the vulnerability in and of itself. And, naturally, the Just World Fallacy that is believed by far too many says that those who are vulnerable deserve massive punishment. The American government identifies employees with financial troubles and sacks them on the grounds that they could be recruited by spies. The whole credit system in a way operates on that basis; those who cannot afford to pay extra must and those who can do not. Piling on is the way of things. Those who are powerful must be virtuous by definition. The Just World Fallacy, after all, tell them this. Many people assume that anyone who is the victim of violence must have done something to deserve it. This is particularly widespread when it comes to police violence.

Laisser un commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion / Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Google+

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Google+. Déconnexion / Changer )

Connexion à %s